Second Open Letter to Members of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, by 25 leading European research centres on the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. The letter identifies a scientific consensus
– that the proposed exception for text-and-data-mining in Art. 3 will not achieve its goal to stimulate innovation and research if restricted to certain organisations,
– that the proposals for a new publishers’ right under Art. 11 will favour incumbent press publishing interests rather than innovative quality journalism,
– and that the proposals for Art. 13 threaten the user participation benefits of the e-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC).
The letter and resource page also offers access to independent evidence to assist the legislative process (26 April 2018).
First Open Letter to Members of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union by 35 legal, economic and social scientists (representing the leading European centres researching intellectual property and innovation law) opposing Articles 11 and 13 of the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Article 11 creates a new exclusive right for press publishers and Article 13 concerns the liability of online intermediaries for user generated content (24 February 2017).
Response to Article 11 of the Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, entitled ‘Protection of press publications concerning digital uses’ on behalf of thirty seven professors and leading scholars of Intellectual Property, Information Law and Digital Economy and led by Lionel Bently, Co-Director of CIPIL, University of Cambridge (5 December 2016).
Response to the Public Consultation by the European Commission on the Role of Publishers in the Copyright Value Chain, on behalf of the European Copyright Society by Martin Kretschmer, Séverine Dusollier, Christophe Geiger, and P. Bernt Hugenholtz (15 June 2016).
- [This Opinion was published as a CREATe Working Paper, and in the European Intellectual Property Review E.I.P.R. 36(10): 591-595 (September 2016)]
Response to the Public Consultation by the European Commission on the Evaluation and Modernisation of the Legal Framework for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights on behalf of CREATe by Elena Cooper, Theodore Koutmeridis and Martin Kretschmer (April 2016).
Professor Derek McAuley was appointed in September 2015 as special advisor to the House of Lords EU committee inquiry into Online Platforms in the EU Digital Single Market.
- The Report of the Select Committee (10th Report of Session 2015–16, 128pp) can be downloaded here (20 April 2016).
Professor Lilian Edwards was appointed for 2015/16 as Researcher in Residence at the Digital Catapult, and in 2016 as acting manager of the Personal Data and Trust Network.
- The Networks Review TRUST IN PERSONAL DATA: Following and assessing the UK’s journey to becoming a data-driven nation (2015) is available here.
Georg von Graevenitz, Senior Lecturer in Quantitative Methods in the Business School of Queen Mary University of London was commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) to produce a report providing evidence on trade mark clutter in the unified trade mark register of the European Union.
- The report ‘Cluttering and Non-use of Trademarks in Europe‘ was published in August 2015 and is available here.
Letter by UK Intellectual Property Law Professors to the Parliamentary Scrutiny Committee on Secondary Legislation, addressing concerns about the implementation of new copyright exceptions for Parody and Quotation, and Personal Copying for Private Use (4 June 2014).
- UK Intellectual Property Law Professors Letter to Parliamentary Scrutiny Committee on Secondary Legislation
Response to the Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules on behalf of CREATe by Martin Kretschmer, Ronan Deazley, Lilian Edwards, Kristofer Erickson, Burkhard Schafer and Daniel John Zizzo (5 March 2014).
- [This submission was subsequently published as a CREATe working paper, and in the European Intellectual Property Review: E.I.P.R. August 2014, 36(9), pp.547-553]
On behalf of CREATe and the Scottish Council on Archives, submitted by Ronan Deazley (CREATe) and Irene O’Brien (Chair of the Board of Trustees, Scottish Council on Archives) to the Government’s consultation on orphan works (28 February 2014)
Responses submitted with BILETA as part of IPO Technical Review of Draft Legislation on Copyright Exceptions (Summer 2013)
- New Exception for Parody
- Amendments to Exceptions for Education
- New Exception for Data Analysis for Non-commercial Research
- Amendments to Exceptions for Research, Libraries and Archives
Led by Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge)
- Response to Call For Views: Modernising the European Copyright Framework (5 December 2016)
- Repeal of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act s 52/Clause 66 of the ERR Bill
CREATe also contributes to European wide interventions through the European Copyright Society.
- European Copyright Society Issues Opinion on Svensson Hyperlinking Case
- European Copyright Society answer to the EC Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules
- European Copyright Society opinion on The Judgment of the CJEU in Case C-201/13 Deckmyn – Limitations and exceptions as key elements of the legal framework for copyright in the European Union (1 November 2014)
- European Copyright Society Opinion on The Reference to the CJEU in Case C-572/13 Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v. Reprobel SCRL (5 September 2015)
- European Copyright Society Response to the European Commission’s Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Satellite and Cable Directive (15 November 2015)
- European Copyright Society Comment on Trade mark protection of public domain works, in response to the request for an advisory opinion of the EFTA Court, Case E-05/16 – Norwegian Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights – appeal from the municipality of Oslo (1 November 2016)
- European Copyright Society General Opinion on the EU Copyright Reform Package (24 January 2017)