Evidence on Technological Protection Measures: impact on research, education and preservation

Exceptions to copyright exist in Europe and elsewhere to enable beneficial uses such as research and preservation, however the legal status and impact of technological protection measures (TPMs) on these activities remain unclear. TPMs, designed to control the way in which users access digital content, may override lawful activities granted by the legislator, with those removing or circumventing them facing penalties unless they obtain specific authorisation.

Despite provisions in the law to ensure that TPMs cannot be used to prevent legitimate uses, there is relatively little information  as to how they apply in reality, and the challenges and frustrations felt by those who encounter them.

This research has the following aims and sub-projects:

1. Understand the status of TPMs and their relationship to exceptions in EU Member States and other jurisdictions;
2. Survey researchers and research organisations about the challenges encountered due to TPMs and the possibility of circumventing them; and,
3. Develop economic evidence on the overall welfare effects of TPMs and their ramifications on access to knowledge.

Our first report has now been published and upcoming outputs will be linked below as they become available.

Led by Anthony Rosborough, we produced a report on the legal status of TPMs in selected European comparator jurisdictions. The report includes a history and typology of TPMs and a discussion of the relationship between TPMs and the enjoyment of exceptions. This includes identifying relevant national authorities and processes for requesting the removal of TPMs. A significant portion of the report, supplemented by qualitative evidence gathered from practitioner institutions, explores the current practices and points of frustration encountered by research, education and preservation institutions when dealing with TPMs in the course of fulfilling their public roles. The report provides legal and policy analysis building on the doctrinal and empirical data gathered from institutions / national authorities. Where systems for requesting removal of TPMs exist, such as the UK, the report discusses the procedure and resource costs involved for institutions navigating the circumvention measures as outlined in national law. Download the report here 👉

Report 2: Survey on Research and Preservation

Led by Kristofer Erickson, this study provides an updated, comprehensive cross-European survey of the impact of TPMs on privileged beneficiaries of copyright exceptions (Akester, 2009; Favale, 2011; Livermore, 2015; Kampen, 2016). The sample includes individual researchers as well as educational and research institutions and their affiliates. We use a survey/structured interview approach to investigate current practices among a purposive sample of institutions of varying sizes from selected territories across Europe. The survey gathers information about institutional response to TPMs across the range of digital content identified in the call (eBooks, e-journals, film, videos, games, sound recordings, databases, streaming services). Institutions were asked to provide specific information on costs and resources allocated to challenges presented by TPMs in their activities. This report also investigates the possibility for institutions to request removal of TPMs through legal means, and the costs and challenges involved in making those requests. Download the report here 👉

Report 3: Impact of TPMs on Video Game Preservation